|
|
List of Shows
Around the Web
Tell your friends
POPULAR SEARCHES
|
The Young and the Restless - MESSAGE BOARDS
Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: Christine a Top Lawyer, BUT Doesn't Question Where
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
Christine a Top Lawyer, BUT Doesn't Question Where
Started by vampiresrule at 2012/07/10 08:57AMLatest post: 2012/07/12 09:25AM, Views: 3321, Replies: 98
vampiresrule |
Quote lovinthesoaps: Quote Blue 501: Quote vampiresrule: Quote yandrfan99: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. Who cares where Ricky got it she has it, It proves Phyllis rented a car and from what agency oh my the same agency that rented the car that ran down Christine, And when they are going to look at old records they are going to see that Phylliss' name has been removed it shows up nowhere. No one cares how Ricky got it they just care about what it proves. If Christine is a good lawyer, SHE CARES! She bellow and threaten forever, stolen evidence will get her nohwere! Stolen evidence is worthless, except to make Chritine look rather foolish. How long as she been a lawyer? About the same length of time Phyllis has been a nutjob and psychopath? so true....  Maybe Sharon can give Phyllis the name of HER doctor! lol |
Its not real |
Quote vampiresrule: Quote Its not real: Quote Benay: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). The information in the file (including the rental car receipt) was stolen from Phyllis' apartment. Only information/documentation obtained with a legal search warrant is admissible as evidence unless it is turned over by the person to which it belongs. So what about Daisy's scarf? It wasn't obtained with a search warrant and it wasn't turned over by the person who owned it but the cops still had the blood on it tested and were holding it as evidence that Daniel was involved in Daisy's disappearance. Daisy's scarf was found in an alley. That's public domain. An alley may be public domaine but nobody knows how it got there. it is possible that someone stole the scarf from Daisy's house and dropped it in the alley. The police don't know. Just as they don't know that the receipt was stolen from PHyllis' house. Maybe Phyllis threw it out and Ricky found it in the dumpster behind her apartment. We saw him take it so we know but the police don't. Since they don't know how the scarf got where it did, and they don't know how the receipt got where it did why would one now be admissible and not the other? |
Modified 2 times(s), last time at:
2012/07/10 03:01PM
countryMomof4 |
As long as the police obtain evidence legally, it doesn't matter. THAT is the important fact. Ricky stole it, BUT the police obtained it legally when they took possession of Ricky's belongings. The evidence is admissible due to that fact. Same with the files from Dr. Tim. Ricky stole them but the police obtained them legally. |
|
Its not real |
Quote countryMomof4: As long as the police obtain evidence legally, it doesn't matter. THAT is the important fact. Ricky stole it, BUT the police obtained it legally when they took possession of Ricky's belongings. The evidence is admissible due to that fact. Same with the files from Dr. Tim. Ricky stole them but the police obtained them legally. That's how it seems to me too. |
lvsdasnow |
Quote Its not real: Quote vampiresrule: Quote Its not real: Quote Benay: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). The information in the file (including the rental car receipt) was stolen from Phyllis' apartment. Only information/documentation obtained with a legal search warrant is admissible as evidence unless it is turned over by the person to which it belongs. So what about Daisy's scarf? It wasn't obtained with a search warrant and it wasn't turned over by the person who owned it but the cops still had the blood on it tested and were holding it as evidence that Daniel was involved in Daisy's disappearance. Daisy's scarf was found in an alley. That's public domain. An alley may be public domaine but nobody knows how it got there. it is possible that someone stole the scarf from Daisy's house and dropped it in the alley. The police don't know. Just as they don't know that the receipt was stolen from PHyllis' house. Maybe Phyllis threw it out and Ricky found it in the dumpster behind her apartment. We saw him take it so we know but the police don't. Since they don't know how the scarf got where it did, and they don't know how the receipt got where it did why would one now be admissible and not the other? Just another end-less storyline. In 10 years, maybe it will be solved. Daisy's disappearance is not as important as Phyllis right now. Was Christine jaywalking that night? Phyllis was not looking for Paul, was she following Christine? Seems like to me, I remember Phyllis parked on the street when she saw Christine come out from somewhere and go to the street. Was Phyllis trying to catch Christine and Danny together? I know if Paul had not of seen Christine, Paul would not have been hit. Phyllis was after Christine, not Paul. |
Modified 1 times(s), last time at:
2012/07/10 07:21PM
Lady53 |
Quote noony6: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). I agree with your 1st half, the file was Ricky's file that he'd been putting together. It included bits that he'd stolen from Tim, but no one knows that he stole them, & Tim didn't report it because he was more than happy that Ricky got a hold of it. However, Christine & Michael didn't obtain anything illegally, because Ricky is dead & Daisy is missing. Them going through those things is part of the investigation. I don't even think cops need a warrant to go through a dead guys stuff to try & put together the reasons why he was killed, right? Read my post again...that is what I said |
|
Lady53 |
Quote Benay: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). The information in the file (including the rental car receipt) was stolen from Phyllis' apartment. Only information/documentation obtained with a legal search warrant is admissible as evidence unless it is turned over by the person to which it belongs. When possible evidence of another crime is discovered during the investigation of a crime it is legal evidence in the crime it is attached to. Phyllis needs to be grateful Paul said Ricky said he got rid of Daisy. Otherwise the cc bill being in Daisy's wallet could be worth looking into for a motive for Phyllis to get rid of her |
noony6 |
Quote lvsdasnow: Quote Its not real: Quote vampiresrule: Quote Its not real: Quote Benay: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). The information in the file (including the rental car receipt) was stolen from Phyllis' apartment. Only information/documentation obtained with a legal search warrant is admissible as evidence unless it is turned over by the person to which it belongs. So what about Daisy's scarf? It wasn't obtained with a search warrant and it wasn't turned over by the person who owned it but the cops still had the blood on it tested and were holding it as evidence that Daniel was involved in Daisy's disappearance. Daisy's scarf was found in an alley. That's public domain. An alley may be public domaine but nobody knows how it got there. it is possible that someone stole the scarf from Daisy's house and dropped it in the alley. The police don't know. Just as they don't know that the receipt was stolen from PHyllis' house. Maybe Phyllis threw it out and Ricky found it in the dumpster behind her apartment. We saw him take it so we know but the police don't. Since they don't know how the scarf got where it did, and they don't know how the receipt got where it did why would one now be admissible and not the other? Just another end-less storyline. In 10 years, maybe it will be solved. Daisy's disappearance is not as important as Phyllis right now. Was Christine jaywalking that night? Phyllis was not looking for Paul, was she following Christine? Seems like to me, I remember Phyllis parked on the street when she saw Christine come out from somewhere and go to the street. Was Phyllis trying to catch Christine and Danny together? I know if Paul had not of seen Christine, Paul would not have been hit. Phyllis was after Christine, not Paul. Really?! You're going to try & push the defense that she was only aiming for one of the victims? Could someone tell me, when a shooter opens fire in like a bank or a club, & they hit a few more than the one they were aiming for, do they only get charged for the person they were trying to shoot?? Christine & Paul were leaving together, seperating for the night so the groom wouldn't see the bride. She was on her way to her car, & Paul was on his way to his...Phyllis was parked outside WAITING for Christine to come out. Paul heard the screeching car, looked up & saw it headed for Christine & tried to throw her out of the way of the car. It struck them both & THEN TOOK OFF...Even if she wasn't trying to kill Christine & it was an accident, she still took off & hid everything about her involvement...that is still awful! |
|
noony6 |
Quote Lady53: Quote noony6: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Ricky got the information on Phyllis! GMAB! It doesn't occurr to either of these lawyers that Ricky stole that file? GMAB!! The penthouse security tapes would show Ricky and Daisy breaking into Phyllis apartment multiple times. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). I agree with your 1st half, the file was Ricky's file that he'd been putting together. It included bits that he'd stolen from Tim, but no one knows that he stole them, & Tim didn't report it because he was more than happy that Ricky got a hold of it. However, Christine & Michael didn't obtain anything illegally, because Ricky is dead & Daisy is missing. Them going through those things is part of the investigation. I don't even think cops need a warrant to go through a dead guys stuff to try & put together the reasons why he was killed, right? Read my post again...that is what I said Sorry, I totally misread that! Clearly I was ready to get off work LOL |
|
Lady53 |
Quote jimjay001: Quote Lady53: Quote vampiresrule: Quote TxRangerFan: considering she went tot he Kmart school of Law and become a lawyer as fast as Nick went to boarding school as a 6 year old and came home 6 months later as a 17 year mass of Testosterone! lol! Now that they KNOW what Ricky is capable of, that he murdered his ex girlfriend, tried to kill Eden, and is suspected in Daisy's disappearnce, red flags should be going off all over the place for these two LAWYERS! GET OVER IT... What Ricky did has nothing to do with what Phyllis did I'm not picking up the correlation, Lady53. I think vampiresrule brings up a valid point, regardless of who the players are. Is it really admissible as evidence if it was obtained fraudulently? Why is no one connecting the dots and considering Ricky may have had something to do with Tim's disappearance? She had a valid point. Why the bolded, curt response? Why the response...because in my post #9 in this thread I responded to her and answered her comments, which I will paste here also. The FILE that was found in Ricky's things was a file Ricky had created with news clipings and other info on phyllis. He was compiling info for the tell all book. It isn't the file he stole from Phyllis. He was smart in taking out of it what he needed/wanted and got rid of the rest. As for them thinking he stole the info, I think it is safe to say they know that but it doesn't matter in the scheme of things how Ricky got it. What matters is that they obtained it legally themselves(Michael & Christine). The thing is she continues to go on and on responding to posters saying the same thing over and over like she is trying to convince them she is right when she isn't. I wasn't being curt when bolding it. I was trying to make sure she saw it. I mean if most everybody else is telling her the same thing then maybe she isn't seeing it. But then again just not accepting it when she needs to. As for Dr Tim....in one of the recent eppis Phyllis admitted to Avery she paid Tim $50K to get out of town because she said she didn't want Ricky talking to him about their sessions. |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
