|
|
List of Shows
Around the Web
Tell your friends
POPULAR SEARCHES
|
The Young and the Restless - MESSAGE BOARDS
Soaps Boards :: The Young and the Restless Forum :: Hit and Run: Who actually cares that Phyllis tried
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
Hit and Run: Who actually cares that Phyllis tried
Started by Yale Steam at 2012/06/30 07:58AMLatest post: 2012/07/06 07:23PM, Views: 6867, Replies: 238
Earthling |
Quote countryMomof4: Quote Blue 501: Quote Earthling: Phyllis lost custody of Daniel because of Danny and Christine, therefore she paid for what she did to them. Yet Daisy is entitled to Lucy because she has a chemical imbalance. It's not Daniel's fault Sheila Carters wacko clan insinuated into his life. Daniel did right by Daisy and Lucy and it is Daisy's fault that Lucy has no mother. She should have never involved herself with Ricky, If memory serves me, at the time Danny sued for custody, a parade of "daddies" & "uncles" were marching thru Daniel's life. That, coupled with Phyl's known crimes, were all the court needed to decide Phyl was an unfit mother. She had not lost custody of Daniel at the time she mowed down Paul & Christine. She did that b/c she saw Danny kiss Christine & despite the fact that Christine & Paul were planning to marry. Christine was Danny's lawyer and she presented evidence. The judge makes the decisions, not the lawyer, so I don't ever get putting the blame on Cricket. How did Daniel do right by Daisy and Lucy? He married a girl he didn't love knowing that she was in love with him and wanted to have a real family. Then he proceed to treat Daisy like trash. HE proposed and slept with her to seal the deal. All he did was manipulate her. Well what was Daniel suppose to do? He had custody of Lucy and Ricky framed him which caused Daniel to lose custody. And Daisy knew about it and said nothing. I think if anyone was the manipulator in all this, it was Daisy. Daniel was a married man when Daisy entraped him. Daniel was only allowing himself to be manipulated for Lucy's sake, much like Danny Romalotti married Phyllis for Daniel's sake. Daisy should have lost custody for her manipulations, just like Phyllis did. |
Its not real |
Quote vampiresrule: Quote countryMomof4: Quote Pruny: Quote blubird: Quote vampiresrule: Quote Pruny: I don't think that fans are following this storyline at all. It is a really bad comment on the writing staff for this show. Nobody likes reruns. The only redemtion for this is that the main story is not about Phyllis and the fact that her foot slipped. The main story is about a serial killer, a really mentally disturbed woman that should have never been released from prison in the first place and a dead beat dad who is facing his own guilt about it. The redemption for Nick and his past indescretions with Sharon will also come out of this storyline as well. Nick will love his wife all the way through her trials and she will come out redeemed as a side bar to this whole story. Her rerun is not the focal point of the story and it is not the story. During the storyline, her truth will be revealed for whatever reason. My guess is the writers felt that for Nick and Phyllis to have thier fresh start, they needed to finally shut up the handful of haters who seem to need this for whatever reason. I just don't think that they will get what they want. Phick is a hugely popular couple and Phyllis is the number 2 most popular female chracter on CBS daytime. They aren't going to mess with that. It's total BS. Do we see posters here every day asking for Victor pay for his crimes? We all know what this is really about. MS and JM told us in chat that Phick will overcome the hit and run. If the writers do write it out this way then Nick is really the dolt that everyone believes he is.... no friends or family I know would ever be able to trust a spouse that lied about running down two people in a jealous rage.... soap opera or not .. Phyllis tried to run down two people it's a crime.. as to Victors crimes most are crimes of business .. not attempted murder Brad Carlton bitterly murdered two men in cold blood while Vikki, Sharon and Nick and Paul watched him do it. Where did he pay for those crimes? Did anybody call for him to pay? Kay drove her husband over a cliff but I don't hear anybody calling for her to pay. Jack walked over old Vic while he was dying on the floor and yet I have yet to hear for a call of payment for Jack. C'mon! People aren't fooled by this charade. Phaters just want Phyllis to pay because Nick and she fell in love and left old Sharon in the dust. That is all this merry go round is about and nothing anyone says different will be convincing. Please spare me the same old record...It has nothing,zero, nada to do with Shick. Many of us have disliked Phyllis when she first came to town, claiming she was pregnant with DR''s baby and all her subsequent shenanigans. she was nowhere near Shick at that time. Yes Jack walked away from Victor but he went back and did the right thing.Kay drove her hubby over the cliff when she was drunk and it was investigated by the police just as Sharon was when she hit Cameron over the head. Phyllis left two people for dead in the street. SHE has not been investigated nor punished. While she was spinning her lies for Daniel, the actual H&R was shown. Her intent was clear. How do you know she was lying? You are basing your opinion on an old Bill Bell script. MAB can stay with the orginal verison or she can rewrite the sl her way. She could rewrite anything, anyway she wants . She could write it that Phyllis has always been a boy and a transvestite and that is why Phyllis has been playing her all these years with that mannish look to the character for so long. Maybe she never actually gave birth to Daniel or Summer, she just pretended to be pregnant and stole babies to be her children. You are just basing your opinion of Phyllis on old storylines that MAB could wipe out at any time,with a stroke of her pen. |
Shicky |
Quote Fabulicious Rhapsody: Quote Yale Steam: .... to kill Cricket? I know that some do for obvious reasons but I am only interested in those who may have cheered her on back in the day like I did. I was POed at her for failing. I don't care that she did it. I was glad. I love my Phyllis and of course Phick. They just need to take phyllis out, she is just one of those characters that never learns. She's judging Daisy and is really no better, maybe thats why because it came home to roost in her house, on her son! She is just nasty and canniving no better than the father she condemned so viciously. They should just get rid of the b!tch. The show would be much better! |
countryMomof4 |
Quote Earthling: Quote countryMomof4: Quote Blue 501: Quote Earthling: Phyllis lost custody of Daniel because of Danny and Christine, therefore she paid for what she did to them. Yet Daisy is entitled to Lucy because she has a chemical imbalance. It's not Daniel's fault Sheila Carters wacko clan insinuated into his life. Daniel did right by Daisy and Lucy and it is Daisy's fault that Lucy has no mother. She should have never involved herself with Ricky, If memory serves me, at the time Danny sued for custody, a parade of "daddies" & "uncles" were marching thru Daniel's life. That, coupled with Phyl's known crimes, were all the court needed to decide Phyl was an unfit mother. She had not lost custody of Daniel at the time she mowed down Paul & Christine. She did that b/c she saw Danny kiss Christine & despite the fact that Christine & Paul were planning to marry. Christine was Danny's lawyer and she presented evidence. The judge makes the decisions, not the lawyer, so I don't ever get putting the blame on Cricket. How did Daniel do right by Daisy and Lucy? He married a girl he didn't love knowing that she was in love with him and wanted to have a real family. Then he proceed to treat Daisy like trash. HE proposed and slept with her to seal the deal. All he did was manipulate her. Well what was Daniel suppose to do? He had custody of Lucy and Ricky framed him which caused Daniel to lose custody. And Daisy knew about it and said nothing. I think if anyone was the manipulator in all this, it was Daisy. Daniel was a married man when Daisy entraped him. Daniel was only allowing himself to be manipulated for Lucy's sake, much like Danny Romalotti married Phyllis for Daniel's sake. Daisy should have lost custody for her manipulations, just like Phyllis did. Daniel never did have custody of Lucy, he only had visitation. Ricky made Daniel look like neglectful parent which is why the judge did not award him joint custody. He did tell Daniel that he would revisit the custody issue in 6 months. All Daisy knew was that Ricky was going to do something but Ricky wouldn't tell her what it was so that if she was questioned about it, she could honestly say she didn't know. The only reason that Daniel got the visitation was because of Daisy. She told the judge that she wanted Daniel to be part of Lucy's life. Daniel didn't have to marry Daisy but he did to stay close to Lucy. I don't agree with what he did afterwards. He told Daisy that he wanted to try to make a family for Lucy which wasn't true. He had sex with her to seal the deal. Of course Daisy was believing him and was pizzed when he wasn't living up to his end of the bargain. Daniel didn't need to marry her. He could have waited the 6 months which isn't that long a time and then gone for joint, eventually going for full. |
BabygirlAH |
Quote Yale Steam: .... to kill Cricket? I know that some do for obvious reasons but I am only interested in those who may have cheered her on back in the day like I did. I was POed at her for failing. I don't care that she did it. I was glad. I love my Phyllis and of course Phick. I care as I always liked Cricket. |
GLfan85 |
Quote Its not real: Quote vampiresrule: Quote countryMomof4: Quote Pruny: Quote blubird: Quote vampiresrule: Quote Pruny: I don't think that fans are following this storyline at all. It is a really bad comment on the writing staff for this show. Nobody likes reruns. The only redemtion for this is that the main story is not about Phyllis and the fact that her foot slipped. The main story is about a serial killer, a really mentally disturbed woman that should have never been released from prison in the first place and a dead beat dad who is facing his own guilt about it. The redemption for Nick and his past indescretions with Sharon will also come out of this storyline as well. Nick will love his wife all the way through her trials and she will come out redeemed as a side bar to this whole story. Her rerun is not the focal point of the story and it is not the story. During the storyline, her truth will be revealed for whatever reason. My guess is the writers felt that for Nick and Phyllis to have thier fresh start, they needed to finally shut up the handful of haters who seem to need this for whatever reason. I just don't think that they will get what they want. Phick is a hugely popular couple and Phyllis is the number 2 most popular female chracter on CBS daytime. They aren't going to mess with that. It's total BS. Do we see posters here every day asking for Victor pay for his crimes? We all know what this is really about. MS and JM told us in chat that Phick will overcome the hit and run. If the writers do write it out this way then Nick is really the dolt that everyone believes he is.... no friends or family I know would ever be able to trust a spouse that lied about running down two people in a jealous rage.... soap opera or not .. Phyllis tried to run down two people it's a crime.. as to Victors crimes most are crimes of business .. not attempted murder Brad Carlton bitterly murdered two men in cold blood while Vikki, Sharon and Nick and Paul watched him do it. Where did he pay for those crimes? Did anybody call for him to pay? Kay drove her husband over a cliff but I don't hear anybody calling for her to pay. Jack walked over old Vic while he was dying on the floor and yet I have yet to hear for a call of payment for Jack. C'mon! People aren't fooled by this charade. Phaters just want Phyllis to pay because Nick and she fell in love and left old Sharon in the dust. That is all this merry go round is about and nothing anyone says different will be convincing. Please spare me the same old record...It has nothing,zero, nada to do with Shick. Many of us have disliked Phyllis when she first came to town, claiming she was pregnant with DR''s baby and all her subsequent shenanigans. she was nowhere near Shick at that time. Yes Jack walked away from Victor but he went back and did the right thing.Kay drove her hubby over the cliff when she was drunk and it was investigated by the police just as Sharon was when she hit Cameron over the head. Phyllis left two people for dead in the street. SHE has not been investigated nor punished. While she was spinning her lies for Daniel, the actual H&R was shown. Her intent was clear. How do you know she was lying? You are basing your opinion on an old Bill Bell script. MAB can stay with the orginal verison or she can rewrite the sl her way. She could rewrite anything, anyway she wants . She could write it that Phyllis has always been a boy and a transvestite and that is why Phyllis has been playing her all these years with that mannish look to the character for so long. Maybe she never actually gave birth to Daniel or Summer, she just pretended to be pregnant and stole babies to be her children. You are just basing your opinion of Phyllis on old storylines that MAB could wipe out at any time,with a stroke of her pen. uhm, if MAB was going to re-write it she wouldn't have been showing "re-caps" of the actual H&R. No re-write here, only Phyllis' lies. |
|
GLfan85 |
Quote countryMomof4: Quote Earthling: Quote countryMomof4: Quote Blue 501: Quote Earthling: Phyllis lost custody of Daniel because of Danny and Christine, therefore she paid for what she did to them. Yet Daisy is entitled to Lucy because she has a chemical imbalance. It's not Daniel's fault Sheila Carters wacko clan insinuated into his life. Daniel did right by Daisy and Lucy and it is Daisy's fault that Lucy has no mother. She should have never involved herself with Ricky, If memory serves me, at the time Danny sued for custody, a parade of "daddies" & "uncles" were marching thru Daniel's life. That, coupled with Phyl's known crimes, were all the court needed to decide Phyl was an unfit mother. She had not lost custody of Daniel at the time she mowed down Paul & Christine. She did that b/c she saw Danny kiss Christine & despite the fact that Christine & Paul were planning to marry. Christine was Danny's lawyer and she presented evidence. The judge makes the decisions, not the lawyer, so I don't ever get putting the blame on Cricket. How did Daniel do right by Daisy and Lucy? He married a girl he didn't love knowing that she was in love with him and wanted to have a real family. Then he proceed to treat Daisy like trash. HE proposed and slept with her to seal the deal. All he did was manipulate her. Well what was Daniel suppose to do? He had custody of Lucy and Ricky framed him which caused Daniel to lose custody. And Daisy knew about it and said nothing. I think if anyone was the manipulator in all this, it was Daisy. Daniel was a married man when Daisy entraped him. Daniel was only allowing himself to be manipulated for Lucy's sake, much like Danny Romalotti married Phyllis for Daniel's sake. Daisy should have lost custody for her manipulations, just like Phyllis did. Daniel never did have custody of Lucy, he only had visitation. Ricky made Daniel look like neglectful parent which is why the judge did not award him joint custody. He did tell Daniel that he would revisit the custody issue in 6 months. All Daisy knew was that Ricky was going to do something but Ricky wouldn't tell her what it was so that if she was questioned about it, she could honestly say she didn't know. The only reason that Daniel got the visitation was because of Daisy. She told the judge that she wanted Daniel to be part of Lucy's life. Daniel didn't have to marry Daisy but he did to stay close to Lucy. I don't agree with what he did afterwards. He told Daisy that he wanted to try to make a family for Lucy which wasn't true. He had sex with her to seal the deal. Of course Daisy was believing him and was pizzed when he wasn't living up to his end of the bargain. Daniel didn't need to marry her. He could have waited the 6 months which isn't that long a time and then gone for joint, eventually going for full. Actually, he DID have joint custody and was taking Daisy back to court to get FULL custody which was when Ricky did what he did. Daisy didn't know what he was going to do, but she certainly realized real quick what he did and did't say a word about it to the judge when the judge gave full custody to Daisy. |
|
GLfan85 |
Her's the deal. I LOVE to hate Phyllis. The difference between Phyllis and everyone else on the show is that "crimes" everyone else commits is found out, investigated and dealt with. This crime Phyllis has NEVER been investgated for. It has never been dealt with. Her actions (weather you like Cricket or not) had a huge impact on her and Paul's life. Phyllis went on with life as if nothing happened and was actually po'd that she didn't kill Cricket. She NEVER had any remorse for it, NEVER! Then she sits there and judges everyone else, especially Daisy. They are two peas in a pod those two and it's a darn shame they are writing Daisy off the show! |
vampiresrule |
Quote GLfan85: Quote Its not real: Quote vampiresrule: Quote countryMomof4: Quote Pruny: Quote blubird: Quote vampiresrule: Quote Pruny: I don't think that fans are following this storyline at all. It is a really bad comment on the writing staff for this show. Nobody likes reruns. The only redemtion for this is that the main story is not about Phyllis and the fact that her foot slipped. The main story is about a serial killer, a really mentally disturbed woman that should have never been released from prison in the first place and a dead beat dad who is facing his own guilt about it. The redemption for Nick and his past indescretions with Sharon will also come out of this storyline as well. Nick will love his wife all the way through her trials and she will come out redeemed as a side bar to this whole story. Her rerun is not the focal point of the story and it is not the story. During the storyline, her truth will be revealed for whatever reason. My guess is the writers felt that for Nick and Phyllis to have thier fresh start, they needed to finally shut up the handful of haters who seem to need this for whatever reason. I just don't think that they will get what they want. Phick is a hugely popular couple and Phyllis is the number 2 most popular female chracter on CBS daytime. They aren't going to mess with that. It's total BS. Do we see posters here every day asking for Victor pay for his crimes? We all know what this is really about. MS and JM told us in chat that Phick will overcome the hit and run. If the writers do write it out this way then Nick is really the dolt that everyone believes he is.... no friends or family I know would ever be able to trust a spouse that lied about running down two people in a jealous rage.... soap opera or not .. Phyllis tried to run down two people it's a crime.. as to Victors crimes most are crimes of business .. not attempted murder Brad Carlton bitterly murdered two men in cold blood while Vikki, Sharon and Nick and Paul watched him do it. Where did he pay for those crimes? Did anybody call for him to pay? Kay drove her husband over a cliff but I don't hear anybody calling for her to pay. Jack walked over old Vic while he was dying on the floor and yet I have yet to hear for a call of payment for Jack. C'mon! People aren't fooled by this charade. Phaters just want Phyllis to pay because Nick and she fell in love and left old Sharon in the dust. That is all this merry go round is about and nothing anyone says different will be convincing. Please spare me the same old record...It has nothing,zero, nada to do with Shick. Many of us have disliked Phyllis when she first came to town, claiming she was pregnant with DR''s baby and all her subsequent shenanigans. she was nowhere near Shick at that time. Yes Jack walked away from Victor but he went back and did the right thing.Kay drove her hubby over the cliff when she was drunk and it was investigated by the police just as Sharon was when she hit Cameron over the head. Phyllis left two people for dead in the street. SHE has not been investigated nor punished. While she was spinning her lies for Daniel, the actual H&R was shown. Her intent was clear. How do you know she was lying? You are basing your opinion on an old Bill Bell script. MAB can stay with the orginal verison or she can rewrite the sl her way. She could rewrite anything, anyway she wants . She could write it that Phyllis has always been a boy and a transvestite and that is why Phyllis has been playing her all these years with that mannish look to the character for so long. Maybe she never actually gave birth to Daniel or Summer, she just pretended to be pregnant and stole babies to be her children. You are just basing your opinion of Phyllis on old storylines that MAB could wipe out at any time,with a stroke of her pen. uhm, if MAB was going to re-write it she wouldn't have been showing "re-caps" of the actual H&R. No re-write here, only Phyllis' lies. Maybe or maybe not. That remains to be seen. |
|
vampiresrule |
Quote GLfan85: Her's the deal. I LOVE to hate Phyllis. The difference between Phyllis and everyone else on the show is that "crimes" everyone else commits is found out, investigated and dealt with. This crime Phyllis has NEVER been investgated for. It has never been dealt with. Her actions (weather you like Cricket or not) had a huge impact on her and Paul's life. Phyllis went on with life as if nothing happened and was actually po'd that she didn't kill Cricket. She NEVER had any remorse for it, NEVER! Then she sits there and judges everyone else, especially Daisy. They are two peas in a pod those two and it's a darn shame they are writing Daisy off the show! I am VERY glad they are re-visiting this part of Phyllis' history. And if they were going to re-write it they would not have show'd the original clips where it was VERY obvious that Phyllis intended to run Cricket down. There was no hesitation on her part, she started off slow and then slammed her foot on the gas pettal. No swerving, no slowing down, no stopping, no going back, NOTHING! And now she sits there and LIES about it to Danial and holds him (figuratively) hostage using his horrible insodent with Nick and Sharon's daughter against him. Yeah, NO remorse, no compassion. It's all about Phyllis and covering her own butt. Even went against her blustering about she'd gladly go to prison to save her son from Daisy. Well Cricket can't bring down Phyllis without seriously hurting Daniel, Lucy, Summer and Nick. If she is the saint some folks say she is, we will see. As for Paul, If he even looks at Phyllis too hard, she has ammo that could blow right out of the water. I know he is blond, but I dont' think Paul is dumb enough to go after Phyllis! |
Please register and login to be able to post in this message board.
