WHY EVEN START THIS THREAD IF POSTERS’ THOUGHTS ARE GOING TO BE THROWN BACK IN THEIR FACES? WHY SHOULD YOUR THOUGHTS BE GIVEN CONSIDERATION IF MOST OTHERS’ ARE GOING TO BE TRASHED?
Some say this now: AND RED SAID IT—SHE IS PART OF THE “SOME” YOU TALK DOWN TO. (SOMETIMES YOU SAY “SOME” AND SOMETIMES “ALL”—THE WORDS SEEM INTERCHANGEABLE AND NOT REALLY MEANT TO GIVE SOME PEOPLE’S OPINIONS CREDIT.)
She is welcome to Nick, I actually hope the dunce stays with her.
If Nick were to run straight to Sharon, kiss her, bed after finding this out you would jumping for joy. And you all know it. YOU ARE TELLING RED SHE HAS BEEN DISHONEST AND TELLING ANYONE WHO DOESN'T LOVE PHICK THAT THEY ARE LYING WHEN THEY POST THEIR THOUGHTS. THEY CAN'T POSSIBLY BE OPEN-MINDED AND FAIR AND SINCERE IN WHAT THEY SAY. BUT YOU CAN BE?! MANY OF US HAVE STATED OUR DISLIKE OF PHYL AND/OR PHICK AND HAVE ALSO STATED POSITIVES ABOUT PHYLLIS AND PHONAN, ETC. YOU ARE SAYING THAT ANYONE WHO DISSES PHYL AT ALL CANNOT BE TELLING THE TRUTH IF THEY SAY THEY DON'T WANT SHICK AND IF THEY DON'T CARE IF NICK STAYS WITH PHYL. YOU KNOW EVERYTHING.
YOU SEEM, THEN, TO ONLY POST THREADS ASKING FOR OPINIONS SO YOU CAN USE IT TO INSULT OTHER POSTERS. I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU DO NOT GET BANNED WITH THE FREQUENT "YOU ALL" STATEMENTS THAT SAY YOU KNOW WHAT WE REALLY THINK.
Anyway, moving on, YES, ATTACK POSTERS AND THEN DO THE DISMISSIVE "ANYWAY, MOVING ON...." THIS IS VERY SIMILAR TO YOUR PAST POSTS’ “THEY’RE NOT IMPORTANT” AND “I DON’T CARE” WHAT OTHERS THINK POSTS. WHY SHOULD OTHERS CARE ABOUT YOURS THEN? I love Phyllis but you are right. VERY GENEROUS, NOW FINDING SOMETHING NOT CUTTING TO SAY AND THEN (THIS IS THE SEEMING REASON FOR THAT BIT OF GENEROSITY) MOVING INTO YOUR OPINION, AND PEOPLE ARE NOW SUPPOSED TO BE WILLING LISTENERS? She does judge Daisy and others for their actions without remembering her past. I have pointed this out to on here. I love her but this makes her out to a hypocrite in many eyes around GC. See, I love the character but I can call her out which many of you cannot do YES WE CAN AND WE DO. YOU ARE NOT THE ONLY ONE ABLE TO SEE FLAWS IN WHO YOU LIKE. WE ARE NO LESS INTELLIGENT, ALTHOUGH YOU SURE MAKE IT SOUND LIKE YOU THINK SO. YET PEOPLE SHOULD RESPECT UOUR OPINIONS? OUR OWN DON'T COUNT, JUST YOURS DO? or will not do for characters you approve of or like such as Daisy and Sharon. Example, many of you think it was OK for Daisy to go over to Phyllis' after Daniel told her not to and to leave her alone and why.[/quote] MANY OF US HAVE SAID THINGS CRITICAL OF SHARON AND DAISY. WHEN PEOPLE SAY ANYTHING IN ANY WAY POSITIVE ABOUT THEM, ALL YOU SEEM TO HEAR IS THAT AND YOU DON'T BELIEVE THE POSTERS' CRITICISMS--THERE IS PLENTY OF CRITIQUE SAID IF YOU WANT TO REALLY HEAR IT. WHY DO YOU KEEP TALKING DOWN TO POSTERS WHO DON'T THINK AS YOU DO? HOW DO YOU NOT GET BANNED FOR THE EVERYDAY BASHES YOU MAKE?
WHAT, REALLY, IS THE PURPOSE OF THIS THREAD? IT SEEMS TO BE JUST TO OPEN THE DOOR TO DISSING. THE MEANNESS HAS GOTTEN PROGRESSIVELY WORSE, AND YET THERE’S NO BAN.
(MY APOLOGIES TO POSTERS WHO CONSIDER CAPS AS YELLING. I CAPPED RATHER THAN BOLDED TO DISTINGUISH MY OWN REMARKS.)