I was a little disappointed in the writing today that had Sam & Jason jumping to conclusions..."Of course, Peter is Henrik because he has the lighter!" It would never hold up in a real investigation. Good reason to be suspicious? Definitely! But the guy was involved in luring Faison out of hiding, so it's feasible that he might have ended up with the lighter because of that. But they're just convinced it's him without any more evidence at all or doing any fact-checking. I don't know, seemed like really amateurish writing. I know, it's a soap, but really...?