Quote mdtuttle: MAggie can't test Zappatto's hair because it was taken without a warrent so it wouldn't stand up in court? What about the sample of Fisher's hair? She didn't have a warrent for that and had no ttrouble testing it when she got it from Fisher. Without Jack's knowledge or consent I might add. If I had been Jack I would have said "If you can't use that evidence against Victor if it were aquired without a warrent then you can't use the supposed findings you have about my dog in court either." I would think that would be enough for Jack to blow what flimsiy evidence they have right out of the water. Other than the dog hair they have no physical evidance that connects him to the crime. Even the dog hair is apperently inconclusive, they can't prove it camr from Fisher, just a dog with yellow hair. The fact that Jack was seen on the survalliance video, to me would be more of an area to look into. So much as the time he went into JiMinn's room and was anyone seen on the tape after him.
Yep! that's what I said... She did not have a warrant to take Fisher's hair, but she needs one to take Zapato's? No sense at all... but then... that's how all the story lines have been written for the past months!